Editor-in-Chief
Silvio Scanagatta
Barbara Segatto

Executive Committee
Ursula Apitzsch, Jean-Louis Derouet, Luisa Ribolzi, Alison Taysum, Carlos Alberto Torres, Catherine Yan Wang

International Scientific Board

Management Staff
Managing editor
Anna Dal Ben

Book review editor
Maddalena Colombo

KEEP INFORMED

 

For Italian Law
Iscrizione n.2165 - 13.02.2009 - Registro Stampa Tribunale di Padova

Direttore Responsabile: Giulia Golo

Education 2.0 and Gender: A Case Study on the Use of Interactive Whiteboards in Secondary Schools

TitleEducation 2.0 and Gender: A Case Study on the Use of Interactive Whiteboards in Secondary Schools
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2016
AuthorsCasula C, De Feo A
Secondary TitleItalian Journal of Sociology of Education
Volume8
Issue2
Pagination143-169
Date Published06/2016
PublisherPadova University Press
Place PublishedPadova, IT
ISSN Number2035-4983
Keywordseducation 2.0, educational and professional segregation, gender and technology, interactive whiteboards (IWB)
Abstract

The digitalization of education systems is presented as a possible way to match the concerns of a knowledge based economy with those of an inclusive information society. To meet this double challenge, education systems are asked to shift from a ‘traditional school’ to an ‘Education 2.0’ model, introducing innovative pedagogies through the use of ICT devices characterized by interactivity and multimediality. The article investigates over the presence and breadth of this shift within secondary schools of the region Sardinia, Italy, since the introduction of Interactive Whiteboards (IWB), to focus next on the gender dimension of change. Empirical evidence drawn from an evaluative research adopting a mixed method approach is presented and analysed: first, an idealtype of classroom organization after IWB introduction is offered, then the main gender dynamics emerging in reorganized classrooms are considered, focussing on interaction among its main actors’, namely teachers and students. Conclusions suggest that, although a less gendered approach to technology is observed in classroom practices enhanced by Education 2.0 models, these changes haven’t (yet) led to a reconfiguration of the symbolic representations and tacit assumptions structuring school settings, still hampering fairer educational and professional trajectories for women in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Maths).

URLhttp://ijse.padovauniversitypress.it/2016/2/7
DOI10.14658/pupj-ijse-2016-2-7
Paper: